State Supreme Court Upends James Brown Probate Compromise

Readers in Los Angeles no doubt remember James Brown, the “hardest working man in show business” who was one of the most popular music stars of his time. They may also recall that a major probate fight erupted after Brown’s death in 2006. In the latest twist in that probate case, the South Carolina Supreme Court has ruled that the state’s attorney general overstepped his bounds when he brokered a compromise between the wishes expressed in Brown’s will and trust and those of his purported widow and son.

James Brown created the will and trust in 2000, more than six years before he died on Dec. 25, 2006. In the will, he directed that $2 million of his estate be put into a trust for an education fund for his grandchildren. The rest of his estate was to be donated to help poor students in South Carolina and Georgia pay their educational and personal expenses, except for some personal and household items which were to be distributed between his six children.

But after Brown’s death, his children challenged the will and trust, claiming that his estate planning attorney exercised undue influence on him. Also, a woman claiming to be Brown’s wife emerged, saying that she and their son were entitled to shares of the estate because they married after Brown created the will and trust. Whether the woman was Brown’s legal wife is unclear; she may have already been married at the time of their wedding.

Eventually, the attorney general stepped in under his office’s power to protect charitable trusts. He created a new division of Brown’s assets wherein half of the estate would go to charity, 25 percent would go to the wife and the rest would be divided among the seven children. The trustees of Brown’s estate appealed that decision, saying that there was no reason to go against Brown’s apparent intentions.

The state supreme court agreed. In a recently-issued ruling, the court said the compromise “destroys the estate plan Brown had established” and that the AG violated his duty to protect charitable trusts by instead remaking the estate plan entirely.

Source: Forbes, “Court Scolds SC Attorney General For Hijacking James Brown Estate,” Danielle and Andy Mayoras, Feb. 28, 2013

Louis Pacella

Recent Posts

Here’s Why You Want to Do all You Can to Avoid Probate When Working With a Will

IntroductionWhen working with a will, it is important to understand the legal process of probate and…

1 year ago

Unmarried Couples: Don’t Forget Your Estate Plan – Living Together Requires Different Legal Preparations

Estate planning is an important consideration for all individuals, regardless of their marital status. However,…

1 year ago

Protect Your Family With a Trust

Your family is not just your own. Bringing up children can be difficult, especially when…

2 years ago

Why You Should Review Your Estate Plan Before Vacation

Planning a vacation can be so exciting. You are ready to race out there, wherever…

2 years ago

Even If You Have Only a Few Assets, Speaking to an Estate Attorney Specialist Is a Must

Factors to Consider When Selecting an Estate Attorney SpecialistSearching for an estate attorney specialist to…

2 years ago

The Holidays Are a Great Time to Bring Up Estate Planning With Your Spouse: Here’s How

Death and taxes are inevitable, right? If you can discuss taxes with your spouse, you…

2 years ago